Even with a mathematical model, it’s difficult to properly compare drivers from different eras. I’ve therefore decided to rank drivers in each decade, starting with the 2010s. Here are the top 20 drivers of the 2010s.
There are different ways to produce a valid ranking, depending on the desired outcome. Is it better to reward strong individual seasons or rocksteady consistency? Here, I’ve ranked them by their 2nd best year in the decade. This allows for a ranking close to an absolute peak, whilst also reducing the possibility for drivers to jump up the ranking due to a single strong year. Years outside of 2010-2019 are not directly counted, but are indirectly used to assess how strong different drivers are in general.
There are also a few criteria that need to be met before a driver can be considered for this list. They need at least 3 years F1 experience, with at least 2 full years within the decade in question. There are 2 drivers that would have featured in the top 20 that were discounted due to inexperience: Vandoorne and Nasr. The tiers represent places where there are significant gaps between the different performance levels. They should be used as guidance to see how similar different drivers are, along with their ranking.
B Tier
20) Robert Kubica

Kubica just about makes the list despite only racing for the first and last year of the decade. 2010 was a strong year for the Pole, and one wonders what he could have done for Lotus (or possibly Ferrari) across the next few years had he not been injured. He was generally outpaced by Russell in his comeback year, but it was a near miracle that he managed to return at all.
19) Kamui Kobayashi

Known for his feisty nature in wheel-to-wheel racing, Kobayashi compared well to de la Rosa in his first full season in 2010. He then partnered Pérez for 2 years with the pair being closely matched (80pts to 79pts in favour of Pérez). However, he failed he find a drive for the next year. A return to the uncompetitive Caterham team in 2014 failed to deliver results or rekindle his career.
18) Heikki Kovalainen

Kovalainen’s career never really recovered from being Hamilton’s teammate. His spirited drives in uncompetitive Caterham/Lotus cars didn’t yield any points. There were, however some impressive performances if you looked closely enough.
17) Esteban Ocon

Like Kobayashi, Ocon also partnered Pérez, and came out second best (162pts vs 136pts). Their relationship was heated, with the two making contact several times in their years together. At the end of the decade Mercedes no longer thoughyt he was part of their future, but he was subsequently offered a lifeline by Renault.
16) Michael Schumacher

Schumacher’s return in 2010 was a definite disappointment, but he improved significantly in the next two years. This is despite his ever increasing age. Monaco 2012 sums up his comeback pretty well: A brilliant “pole” lap, combined with a grid penalty for a clumsy collision at the previous race and an eventual DNF.
15) Kimi Räikkönen

Lotus took a calculated risk on Räikkönen returning to the sport in 2012, but he rewarded them with 2 wins. (It took 8 years for team Enstone to win again). His 2nd stint at Ferrari was less successful, with a single victory in 5 years despite some more than capable cars.
14) Marcus Ericsson

Ericsson is given a surprisingly high rating, and appears higher than expected in other mathematical models too. He debuted in the uncompetitive Caterham before moving to Sauber. There he raced against Felipe Nasr for two seasons, before being LeClerc’s first teammate. His higher than expected ranking is probably due to this comparison, although he was beaten 39pts to 9pts in their season together.
13) Valterri Bottas

Bottas had some impressive drives at Williams, before finding himself in championship winning cars at Mercedes. He is incredibly lucky to have occupied such a position, but his inclusion here suggests that he is talented. 13th place suggests he’s not one of the elite of the sport though.
12) Jean-Eric Vergne

Vergne has the dubious honour of being the highest ranked of the rejected Toro Rosso drivers. He was overlooked for the Red Bull drive twice, once for Ricciardo, and a second time for Kvyat (a driver that the model thinks Vergne was significantly better than). His success in Formula E underlines his talent, and Red Bull may have regretted letting him go.
11) Sergio Pérez

As noted in the career review, Pérez is one of the most consistent and reliable drivers, with little year-to-year variation. This perhaps hurts his ranking here slightly, as it is based on the peak two years. Sergio spent the entire decade in midfield cars, being labelled the “King of the Midfield” in a somewhat backhanded compliment.
10) Nico Hülkenberg

Hülkenberg drove for 4 different teams across the decade, but, like Pérez, never escaped the midfield in the 2010s. Unlike Pérez, he never achieved a podium and is still without an opportunity at a top team. This shows that talent is not always enough in Formula One.
A Tier
9) Nico Rosberg

The A tier are all incredibly tight. Rosberg is more considered to have been more consistent than others around him, but with lower peaks. After convincingly beating Schumacher in their 3 years together (325pts vs 197pts), some concluded that Schumacher was hopeless. Given how closely Rosberg raced Hamilton over the next 4 years together, it’s far more likely that Rosberg was just very good.
8) Jenson Button

Button can consider himself lucky to even be in F1 in the 2010s due to his rollercoaster of a career. Ultimately his McLaren years cemented his reputation as a wet weather specialist. He could also give fellow champions Hamilton and Alonso more than a headache at times, even if a second championship eluded him.
7) Carlos Sainz

At times it feels like Sainz flies under the radar. He had a promising opening season versus Verstappen before getting stuck at Toro Rosso. When he did break free, he was beaten by Ricciardo at Renault. Indeed, the only teammates he outscored in the 2010s were a rookie Norris and a dejected Kvyat. Given what we now know of Verstappen and Norris’ talents, his results against them are impressive indeed.
6) Sebastian Vettel

The model considers Vettel to be a very good driver, but not quite the best of the best. Given this, 6th place feels about right despite his quadruple champion success. His career definitely features peaks and troughs, but he showed at both Red Bull and Ferrari that he can be devastating in a car that is set up as he likes it.
5) Daniel Ricciardo

Ricciardo just about edges out similarly ranked drivers such as Vettel, Sainz, Button and Rosberg. This is thanks to highly ranked performances versus other strong teammates (Verstappen and Vettel). His recent McLaren struggles have made him look very ordinary, but there’s no doubt that he was an extremely capable racer for most of the 2010s.
Notable omissions:
Before we look at the top tier, I thought it’d be worthwhile to mention some drivers that didn’t make the cut.

Felipe Massa just misses out on a top 20 spot. This is due to a winless decade despite having a car that twice challenged for the title. It’s possible that this was due to him returning from injury sustained in 2008, but his comeback in 2010 is actually considered his best of the decade, making this conclusion seem overly simplistic at best. Romain Grosjean and Kevin Magnussen are another 2 experienced drivers not to feature. They are in 22nd and 23rd places respectively. Mark Webber is easily the most successful driver in the decade to miss out, in 24th place. He was only active for 4 years during the decade, and in 2 of those years (2011 and 2013) he was pretty badly crushed by Vettel.
The only other race winner from the decade not to be included is Pastor Maldonado. This is perhaps not the most surprising omission given his high crash rate and lack of consistency. Finally, as previously mentioned, Vandoorne and Nasr may have made the cut with more experience to assess their level.
S Tier
4) Charles LeClerc

The fact that LeClerc only just meets the requirements to be included and is still ranked the 4th best of the decade speaks volumes about his talent. His 2018 debut was impressive enough for him to be given a Ferrari drive after only 1 year. His 2019 season was strong enough for Ferrari to consider him their lead man going forward. Although he’s prone to silly mistakes, his raw pace is immense.
3) Lewis Hamilton

The most successful driver of time is unsurprisingly the most successful of the 2010s too. The first two years of the decade were not his strongest, and at one point it looked like Button was beginning to establish himself as the team leader at McLaren. Hamilton fought back in 2012 before a shrewd move to Mercedes paid off beautifully. Not only did he win more races and championships as the decade progressed, but he became a more complete racing driver too. When was the last time Hamilton had a bad season?
2) Max Verstappen

It’s fair to say that Verstappen quickly became a sensation. His form fluctuated a little during these early years (his ranking falls behind Hamilton if the 3rd best year is considered, rather than the 2nd best, for example), but he is clearly a very special talent.
1) Fernando Alonso

This will come as no surprise to regular readers of this blog. Alonso’s 2012 season is often regarded as one of the finest ever that failed to deliver a title. However, his 2014 season is actually ranked even higher. His McLaren performances are harder to assess due to the abysmal competitiveness and reliability, but the model thinks he was highly competitive throughout.
Pingback: 2000s Supergrid – Motorsport Analysis
Pingback: 1990s Supergrid – Motorsport Analysis
Pingback: Michael Schumacher Mathematical Career Review – Motorsport Analysis
Pingback: Contents Page – Motorsport Analysis
Pingback: 1980s F1 Drivers Ranked – Motorsport Analysis
Pingback: 1990s F1 Drivers Ranked - F1 Analysis
Pingback: 1980s F1 Drivers Ranked - F1 Analysis
Pingback: 2000s F1 Drivers Ranks - F1 Analysis